Jonathan R.K. Stroud is the Chief Patent Counsel at Unified Patents Inc., where he manages a docket of more than 50 IPR petitions, appeals, licensing, settlement, and district court litigation. Prior to that, he was a patent litigator at Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, where he worked on
litigation, motion practice, and AIA post-grant review procedures,
including covered business method (CBM) patents. Prior to joining
Finnegan, Mr. Stroud worked at the USPTO as a patent examiner for five
years, where he examined patent applications relating to medical
devices. He has been published more than a dozen times in journals such as the The American University Law Review, the Administrative Law Review, the Columbia Science and Technology Law Review, the Journal of the Patent & Trademark Office Society, the Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property Law, and others.
![](https://s3.amazonaws.com/production.scholastica/profile/3932/avatar/thumb/LinkedIn_Photo.jpg?1474059633)
Unified Patents Inc.
American University Washington College of Law IP
patent law, intellectual property law, civil procedure, trade secrets, u.s. international trade commission, biosimilars, ipr, pgr, cbm, post-grant review, federal circuit, patent litigation, patent appeals
community karma
: 9967
About Me
Publications
- Jonathan R.K. Stroud, “The Tragedy of the Commons: Toward a Hybrid Property/Tort Understanding of Trade Secrets,” Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, (forthcoming 2013).
- P. Andrew Riley and Jonathan R.K. Stroud, “Trade Secrets at the International Trade Commission: A Survey,” 15 Colum. Sci. & Tech. L. Rev., (forthcoming 2013).
- Jonathan R.K. Stroud, “Comment, The Illusion of Interchangeability: The Benefits and Dangers of Guidance-Plus Rulemaking in the FDA's Biosimilar Approval Process,” 66 Administrative Law Review 599, (2012).
- Jonathan R.K. Stroud, “A Million Tiny Pieces: The Federal Circuit's Fractured Myriad Ruling, Lessons to be Learned, and the Way Forward,” 3 IP Theory 72, (2012).
Recent Conversations
-
0
Asked the question "The prohibitively high cost of proactive patent review", and has received 0 votes.